4.6 Article

Successful desensitization with proteasome inhibition and costimulation blockade in sensitized nonhuman primates

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 1, Issue 24, Pages 2115-2119

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017010991

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health from the Office of the Director/Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [5R24OD010976]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) [1U24AI126683]
  3. Yerkes National Primate Research Center
  4. Duke Laboratory Animal Resources
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [U19AI051731]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detrimental effects of donor-directed antibodies in sensitized transplant patients remain a difficult immunologic barrier to successful organ transplantation. Antibody removal is often followed by rebound. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) deplete antibodyproducing plasma cells (PCs) but have shown marginal benefit for desensitization. In an allosensitized nonhuman primate (NHP) model, we observed increased germinal center (GC) formation after PI monotherapy, suggesting a compensatory PC repopulation mediated via GC activation. Here we show that costimulation blockade (CoB) targets GC follicular helper T (Tfh) cells in allosensitized NHPs. Combined PI and CoB significantly reduces bone marrow PCs (CD19(+)CD20(-)CD38(+)), Tfh cells (CD4(+)ICOS(+)PD(-)1(hi)), and GC B cells (BCL-6(+)CD20(+)); controls the homeostatic GC response to PC depletion; and sustains alloantibody decline. Importantly, dual PC and CoB therapy prolongs rejection-free graft survival in major histocompatibility complex incompatible kidney transplantation without alloantibody rebound. Our study illustrates a translatable desensitization method and provides mechanistic insight into maintenance of alloantibody sensitization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available