4.7 Article

Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 4321-4345

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01LS1201A2]
  2. EU FP7 HELIX project [603864]
  3. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [641816, 642018, 689150, 642147]
  4. Leibniz Competition project [SAW-2013-PIK-5]
  5. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety [11_II_093_Global_A_SIDS_and_LDCs]
  6. joint UK BEIS-Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  7. European Union's Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration [603396]
  8. Kanne Rassmussen Foundation, Denmark
  9. BEIS-Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  10. European Research Council Synergy grant [ERC-2013-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  11. ANR Convergence Lab project CLAND
  12. Nippon Foundation
  13. US National Science Foundation [1243232]
  14. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0604700]
  15. SKLURE Grant [SKLURE2017-1-6]
  16. Program for Risk Information on Climate Change by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Sports, Science and Technology
  17. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research VIDI grant
  18. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H01705, 26287110] Funding Source: KAKEN
  19. Directorate For Geosciences
  20. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1243232] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Paris, France, December 2015, the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) invited the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide a special report in 2018 on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. In Nairobi, Kenya, April 2016, the IPCC panel accepted the invitation. Here we describe the response devised within the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) to provide tailored, cross-sectorally consistent impact projections to broaden the scientific basis for the report. The simulation protocol is designed to allow for (1) separation of the impacts of historical warming starting from pre-industrial conditions from impacts of other drivers such as historical land-use changes (based on pre-industrial and historical impact model simulations); (2) quantification of the impacts of additional warming up to 1.5 degrees C, including a potential overshoot and longterm impacts up to 2299, and comparison to higher levels of global mean temperature change (based on the lowemissions Representative Concentration Pathway RCP2.6 and a no-mitigation pathway RCP6.0) with socio-economic conditions fixed at 2005 levels; and (3) assessment of the climate effects based on the same climate scenarios while accounting for simultaneous changes in socio-economic conditions following the middle-of-the-road Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP2, Fricko et al., 2016) and in particular differential bioenergy requirements associated with the transformation of the energy system to comply with RCP2.6 compared to RCP6.0. With the aim of providing the scientific basis for an aggregation of impacts across sectors and analysis of cross-sectoral interactions that may dampen or amplify sectoral impacts, the protocol is designed to facilitate consistent impact projections from a range of impact models across different sectors (global and regional hydrology, lakes, global crops, global vegetation, regional forests, global and regional marine ecosystems and fisheries, global and regional coastal infrastructure, energy supply and demand, temperature-related mortality, and global terrestrial biodiversity).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available