4.7 Article

Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Mediates Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 7288-7300

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1544

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the NIH [U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180857, U10CA180858]
  2. legacy grants [CA31946, CA33601, U10CA047577, U10CA031983]
  3. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA016672]
  4. R01 grants [CA87548, CA1522218]
  5. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) grant [RP170079]
  6. Susan G. Komen for the Cure grant [KG100521]
  7. CPRIT training grants [RP140106, RP170067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Preoperative aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy has demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. However, many patients have disease that is either intrinsically resistant to AIs or that responds initially but develops resistance after prolonged exposure. We have shown that patients with breast tumors expressing the deregulated forms of cyclin E [ low molecular weight forms (LMW-E)] have poor overall survival. Herein, we hypothesize that LMW-E expression can identify HR-positive tumors that are unresponsive to neoadjuvant AI therapy due to the inability of AIs to induce a cytostatic effect. Experimental Design: LMW-E was examined in breast cancer specimens from 58 patients enrolled in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031, a neoadjuvant AI clinical trial. The mechanisms of LMW-E-mediated resistance to AI were evaluated in vitro and in vivo using an inducible model system of cyclin E (full-length and LMW-E) in aromatase-overexpressing MCF7 cells. Results: Breast cancer recurrence-free interval was significantly worse in patients with LMW-E-positive tumors who received AI neoadjuvant therapy, compared with those with LMW-E negative tumors. Upon LMW-E induction, MCF7 xenografts were unresponsive to letrozole in vivo, resulting in increased tumor volume after treatment with AIs. LMW-E expression overcame cell-cycle inhibition by AIs in a CDK2/Rb-dependent manner, and inhibition of CDK2 by dinaciclib reversed LMW-E-mediated resistance, whereas treatment with palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, did not. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings suggest that cell-cycle deregulation by LMW-E mediates resistance to AIs and a combination of CDK2 inhibitors and AIs may be an effective treatment in patients with HR-positive tumors that express LMW-E. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available