4.7 Article

Refined modeling and identification of complex rock blocks and block-groups based on an enhanced DFN model

Journal

TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 23-34

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.002

Keywords

Rock block; Block identification; Monte Carlo simulation; Discrete fracture network (DFN); Stochastic polygonal model; Underground powerhouse

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51379006, 51622904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Valid modeling and identification of rock blocks are the keys to analyzing rock-mass stability. Based on the Monte Carlo method and 2D Poisson point process, an enhanced polygonal discrete fracture network (DFN) model is proposed firstly. The equal area conversion algorithm and subarea simulation method are used to control fracture size and to determine fracture shape, respectively. Then, coupling the polygonal DFN model with the large-scale geological model, a refined rock mass structure model for identifying rock blocks is established. Subsequently, the spatial representations of polygonal fracture planes, complex geological surfaces and free surfaces are presented. And the major characteristics and the refined modeling method of complex rock blocks and block-groups are analyzed. Finally, a modified and precise topology-based identification method of rock blocks and block-groups is put forward. The application in the underground powerhouse of a hydropower station indicates that the proposed approach and scheme are very efficient and can identify arbitrary-shaped rock blocks. The identified rock blocks and block-groups contain geometric information, geological information as well as physical and mechanical information. This research contributes to further study on the stability analysis of rock blocks and block groups and rock mass seepage. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available