4.4 Article

Math anxiety and math performance in children: The mediating roles of working memory and math self-concept

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 573-589

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12165

Keywords

children; math achievement; math anxiety; math self-concept; working memory

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [PSI2016-80416-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundNumerous studies, most of them involving adolescents and adults, have evidenced a moderate negative relationship between math anxiety and math performance. There are, however, a limited number of studies that have addressed the mechanisms underlying this relation. AimsThis study aimed to investigate the role of two possible mediational mechanisms between math anxiety and math performance. Specifically, we sought to test the simultaneous mediating role of working memory and math self-concept. SampleA total of 167 children aged 8-12years participated in this study. MethodsChildren completed a set of questionnaires used to assess math and trait anxiety, math self-concept as well as measures of math fluency and math problem-solving. Teachers were asked to rate each student's math achievement. As measures of working memory, two backward span tasks were administered to the children. ResultsA series of multiple mediation analyses were conducted. Results indicated that both mediators (working memory and math self-concept) contributed to explaining the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement. ConclusionsResults suggest that working memory and self-concept could be worth considering when designing interventions aimed at helping students with math anxiety. Longitudinal designs could also be used to better understand the mediational mechanisms that may explain the relationship between math anxiety and math performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available