4.4 Article

Social inclusion and relationship satisfaction of patients with a severe mental illness

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 63, Issue 8, Pages 773-781

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0020764017737572

Keywords

Severe mental illness; schizophrenia; social network; social isolation; relationship satisfaction

Categories

Funding

  1. Stichting tot Steun VCVGZ [ST13102.Me2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Research suggests that patients with a severe mental illness (SMI) are among the most social excluded in society. However, comparisons of social network composition and relationship satisfaction between SMI patients and a control group are rare. Aims: Our aim was to compare differences in size, satisfaction and composition of the social network between patients with SMI and a control group. Potential sociodemographic and clinical risk factors in relation to social network size in SMI patients were explored. Methods: The sample consisted of a control group (N=949) and SMI patients (N=211) who were under treatment in Dutch mental health care institutions. In these groups, network size, relationship satisfaction, sociodemographic and clinical (patients only) characteristics were assessed. Results: Social network size was 2.5times lower in SMI patients, which was also reflected in a lower relationship satisfaction. The composition of the social network of SMI patients differs from that of controls: patients' network seems to consist of a smaller part of friends. Different risk factors were associated with the impoverishment of the social network of family, friends and acquaintances of patients with SMI. Conclusion: SMI patients have very small networks compared to controls. This may be a problem, given the ongoing emphasis on outpatient treatment of SMI patients and self-dependence. This outcome advocates for more attention to social isolation of SMI patients and involvement of family in the treatment and aftercare of SMI patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available