4.2 Article

Induction of apoptosis in response to improved gedunin by liposomal nano-encapsulation in human non-small-cell lung cancer (NCI-H292) cell line

Journal

TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 2079-2087

Publisher

PHARMACOTHERAPY GROUP
DOI: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i9.6

Keywords

Lung cancer; Gedunin; Liposome; Nanoencapsulation; Apoptosis; Anti-proliferative activity; Nuclear chromatin

Funding

  1. Institute of Biochemistry Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Colombo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the anti-proliferative activity of free and nanoencapsulated gedunin against human non-small-cell lung cancer (NCI-H292) cells. Methods: Gedunin-loaded nanoliposomes (LG) were prepared using thin-film hydration method. Antiproliferative effects of free and LD were evaluated by sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Apoptotic effects of gedunin-loaded liposomes were assessed by evaluating expressions of p53, Bax and survivin genes, caspase 3/7 activities, DNA fragmentation and morphological changes after staining with Hoechst 33342 and acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB). Results: Cell proliferation data and microscopic visualization demonstrated a higher anti-proliferative activity for LG than the encapsulant (liposomes) alone. LG exhibited dose-and time-dependent 10-fold anti-proliferative activity compared to the free drug, while displaying tolerable belligerence towards normal human lung fibroblast (MRC-5) cells. Apoptosis detection assays and gene expression analysis revealed the transcriptional modulation of the apoptosis-related genes (p53, survivin and Bax), increased activity of caspase 3/7 and the condensation of nuclear chromatin, implying the induction of apoptosis by the nano-formulation in NCI-H292 cells. Conclusion: LG may therefore be considered as a potential nano-formulation which can target nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available