4.5 Article

Time and psychostimulants: Opposing long-term structural effects in the adult ADHD brain. A longitudinal MR study

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 1238-1247

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.10.035

Keywords

Adult ADHD; Psychostimulants; Methylphenidate; Longitudinal; Striatum; Putamen

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2012-32362]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI12/01139]
  3. European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP network: 'ADHD across the lifespan')
  4. Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term effects of psychostimulants such as methylphenidate on ADHD patients have been proved to be difficult to capture in cross-sectional studies comparing medicated and non medicated samples and in longitudinal studies with children, with age-related maturational processes possibly confounding independent effects of medication. However, chronic psychostimulant administration at therapeutic doses has been proven to yield profound neuroadaptive changes in rodent models. Here, we present for the first time the effect of psychostimulant treatment on brain volumes in a sample of medication-naive adult ADHD patients. We investigated grey matter volume changes in a sample of 41 medication-naive adult ADHD patients before and after three years of psychostimulant treatment (N = 25) or no treatment (N = 16) compared to healthy adults (N = 25). We found a significant group x time interaction effect on left putamen grey matter volumes, with a decrease in left putamen volumes in the non-medicated group compared to both the medicated group and controls, and no differences between the medicated group and controls. Our results suggest a normalizing effect of psychostimulant treatment on the left putamen volume loss detected in non-medicated ADHD patients. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available