4.5 Article

Differential DNA methylation and gene expression in reciprocal hybrids between Solanum lycopersicum and S. pimpinellifolium

Journal

DNA RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 597-607

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsx028

Keywords

tomato; reciprocal hybridization; MeDIP-seq; siRNAs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31272159, 31572118]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ12C15001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wide hybridization is a common and efficient breeding strategy for enhancing crop yield and quality. An interesting phenomenon is that the reciprocal hybrids usually show different phenotypes, and its underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we reported our comparative analysis of the DNA methylation patterns in Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum pimpinellifolium and their reciprocal hybrids by methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing. The reciprocal hybrids had lower levels of DNA methylation in CpG islands and LTR retroelements when compared with those of their parents. Importantly, remarkable differences in DNA methylation patterns, mainly in introns and CDS regions, were revealed between the reciprocal hybrids. These different methylated regions were mapped to 79 genes, 14 of which were selected for analysis of gene expression levels. While there was an inverse correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression in promoter regions, the relationship was complicated in gene body regions. Further association analysis revealed that there were 15 differentially methylated genes associated with siRNAs, and that the methylation levels of these genes were inversely correlated with respective siRNAs. All these data raised the possibility that the direction of hybridization induced the divergent epigenomes leading to changes in the transcription levels of reciprocal hybrids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available