4.8 Article

Oxidation reactivity and nanostructural characterization of the soot coming from farnesane - A novel diesel fuel derived from sugar cane

Journal

CARBON
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 516-529

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.090

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [ENE2014-57043-R]
  2. Universidad de Antioquia [CODI PRG 2015-7907]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-Ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy (RS) and High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) techniques were used to characterize soot gathered from a conventional automotive diesel engine fueled by ultra-low sulfur diesel, gas-to-liquid (GTL), biodiesel, and a diesel fuel derived from sugar cane named farnesane. Soot oxidation reactivity, volatile organic fraction, and active surface area (determined with TGA) followed the order: biodiesel >> GTL > farnesane congruent to diesel. Among all soot samples, biodiesel exhibited the highest FTIR absorption peaks for oxygenated and aliphatic functional groups. The degree of disorder of graphene layers (RS analysis bands), fringe interspace distance (similar to 1.5 nm with XRD, and similar to 0.46 nm with HRTEM), fringe length (similar to 2.5-4 nm with XRD, and similar to 0.9 nm with HRTEM), median fringe tortuosity (similar to 1.1), mean primary particles diameter (similar to 25 nm), and fractal dimension (similar to 2.3) were similar for all soot samples. HRTEM images revealed a marked difference in the burning pattern for biodiesel soot in comparison with the other soot samples. Given the results of this work, under the specific engine test condition and engine configuration, farnesane fuel seems so far to be a promising renewable paraffinic fuel for current diesel engines. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available