4.3 Article

Effect of incubation temperature after devitrification on quality parameters in human sperm cells

Journal

CRYOBIOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 78-81

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.10.005

Keywords

Sperm cryopreservation; Vitrification; Human sperm; Reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. CONICYT, Chile, PAI/Concurso Nacional Insercion en la Academia, Convocatoria [PAI79160030]
  2. Direccion de Investigacion, Universidad de La Frontera, Programa de apoyo a profesores patrocinantes de alumnos de pre y postgrado

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sperm cryopreservation is common in assisted reproduction laboratories, providing a therapeutic option for several clinical conditions. This process has been optimized; however, the effect of post-thaw incubation temperature has been poorly studied. This work analyzed the effect of incubation temperature after devitrification on human sperm quality. Spermatozoa from normozoospermic donors were cryopreserved by vitrification. After devitrification, the spermatozoa were separated into two aliquots: (i) incubated at room temperature (RT, 22-25 degrees C) and (ii) incubated at 37 degrees C. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), viability, mitochondrial membrane potential (AWM), phosphatidylserine externalization and motility were analyzed immediately after devitrification (control) and after 2, 4 and 6 h. Spermatozoa incubated at RT showed a conserved viability and Delta Psi M compared to the control, while the incubation at 37 degrees C promoted a decrease in these parameters. The ROS levels were increased at both incubation conditions. The progressive motility was decreased in all experimental groups and the decrease was more pronounced under incubation at RT. No increase in phosphatidylserine externalization was observed. In conclusion, prior to use in assisted reproduction procedures, devitrified spermatozoa at RT conserve a better viability and Delta Psi M than at 37 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available