4.8 Article

Metabolic engineering of Enterobacter aerogenes for 2,3-butanediol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages 1567-1574

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.166

Keywords

2,3-Butanediol; Enterobacter aerogenes; Metabolic engineering; Sugarcane bagasse

Funding

  1. New & Renewable Energy Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning [20143030091040]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [2012M1A2A2026560]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20143030091040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pathway engineering of Enterobacter aerogenes was attempted to improve its production capability of 2,3-butanediol from lignocellulosic biomass. In the medium containing glucose and xylose mixture as carbon sources, the gene deletion of pflB improved 2,3-butanediol carbon yield by 40%, while the deletion of ptsG increased xylose consumption rate significantly, improving the productivity at 12 hr by 70%. The constructed strain, EMY-22-galP, overexpressing glucose transporter (galP) in the triple gene knockout E. aerogenes, ldhA, pflB, and ptsG, provided the highest 2,3-butanediol titer and yield at 12 hr flask cultivation. Sugarcane bagasse was pretreated with green liquor, a solution containing Na2CO3 and Na2SO3 and was hydrolyzed by enzymes. The resulting hydrolysate was used as a carbon source for 2,3-butanediol production. After 72 hr in fermentation, the yield of 0.395 g/g sugar was achieved, suggesting an economic production of 2,3-butanediol was possible from lignocellulosic biomass with the metabolically engineered strain. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available