4.5 Review

Neurological toxicities associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 659-668

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000503

Keywords

atezolizumab; avelumab; cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; durvalumab; ipilumumab; nivolumab; programmed death-1 receptor; programmed death-ligand 1; pembrolizumab

Funding

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [FDM 41635]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) constitute a novel class of agents recently approved to treat a number of human malignancies. Due to their immunomodulatory mechanism of action, ICIs can generate a wide range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of which neurological toxicities are of special interest because of their potential severity. The objective of this review is to examine the recent literature describing neurological irAEs and discuss their optimal management. Recent findings As opposed to irAEs involving other organs, neurological complications of ICIs are uncommon. These complications encompass various toxicities of the central and peripheral nervous systems, including myositis, myasthenia gravis, demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, meningitis and encephalitis. Neurologic irAEs are often responsive to corticosteroids and other immune-modulating treatments (e.g. plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin), which have been used in patients presenting with severe neurologic irAEs or irAEs unresponsive to corticosteroids. Data from literature indicate that early treatment is critical for reducing the morbidity associated with neurologic irAEs. Summary ICI-associated irAEs constitute a new group of neurologic complications of systemic anticancer therapies. Although potentially severe, these rare neurologic toxicities are often responsive to immune-modulating therapies. Early recognition and treatment is crucial for timely improvement of functional outcome and requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available