4.7 Article

A validated UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib in human plasma

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 374-380

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2017.07.009

Keywords

UPLC-MS/MS; Imatinib; Dasatinib; Nilotinib; Polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive, rapid, simple and economical ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib in human plasma using gliquidone as internal standard (IS). Liquid-liquid extraction method with ethyl acetate was used for sample pre-treatment. The separation was performed on an Xtimate Phenyl column using isocratic mobile phase consisting of A (aqueous phase: 0.15% formic acid and 0.05% ammonium acetate) and B (organic phase: acetonitrile) (A: B=40: 60, v/v). The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min and the total run time was 6 min. The multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions, m/z 494.5 -> 394.5 for imatinib, 488.7 -> 401.5 for dasatinib, 530.7 -> 289.5 for nilotinib and 528.5 -> 403.4 for IS, were chosen to achieve high selectivity in the simultaneous analyses. The method exhibited great improvement in sensitivity and good linearity over the concentration range of 2.6-5250.0 ng/mL for imatinib, 2.0-490.0 ng/mL for dasatinib, and 2.4-4700.0 ng/mL for nilotinib. The method showed acceptable results on sensitivity, specificity, recovery, precision, accuracy and stability tests. This UPLC-MS/MS assay was successfully used for human plasma samples analysis and no significant differences were found in imatinib steady-state trough concentrations among the SLC22A5 -1889T > C or SLCO1B3 699G > A genotypes (P > 0.05). This validated method can provide support for clinical therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic investigations of these three tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available