4.2 Article

Depressive symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: biological mechanistic pathways

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 955-963

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-017-9869-4

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea; Depression; Inflammation; Insomnia; C-reactive protein; Leptin

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute [R01HL080076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the association between depressive symptoms, as well as depressive symptom dimensions, and three candidate biological pathways linking them to Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): (1) inflammation; (2) circulating leptin; and (3) intermittent hypoxemia. Participants included 181 obese adults with moderate-to-severe OSA enrolled in the Cardiovascular Consequences of Sleep Apnea (COSA) trial. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). We assessed inflammation using C-reactive protein levels (CRP), circulating leptin by radioimmunoassay using a double antibody/PEG assay, and intermittent hypoxemia by the percentage of sleep time each patient had below 90% oxyhemoglobin saturation. We found no significant associations between BDI-II total or cognitive scores and CRP, leptin, or percentage of sleep time below 90% oxyhemoglobin saturation after controlling for relevant confounding factors. Somatic symptoms, however, were positively associated with percentage of sleep time below 90% saturation (beta = 0.202, P = 0.032), but not with CRP or circulating leptin in adjusted models. Another significant predictor of depressive symptoms included sleep efficiency (beta(BDI Total) = -0.230, P = 0.003; beta(cognitive) = -0.173, P = 0.030 (beta(somatic) = -0.255, P = 0.001). In patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, intermittent hypoxia may play a role in somatic rather than cognitive or total depressive symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available