4.7 Article

A many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on a projection-assisted intra-family election

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 394-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.052

Keywords

Many-objective optimization; Evolutionary algorithm; Evolution direction; Projection; Angle

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61170081, 61472143, 61673403, 61773410]
  2. Scientific Research Special Plan of Guangzhou Science and Technology Programme [201607010045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, many researchers have put emphasis on the study of how to keep a good balance between convergence and diversity in many-objective optimization. This paper proposes a new many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on a projection-assisted intro family election. In the proposed algorithm, basic evolution directions are adaptively generated according to the current population and potential evolution directions are excavated in each individual's family. Based on these evolution directions, a strategy of intro family election is performed in every family and elite individuals are elected as representatives of the specific family to join the next stage, which can enhance the convergence of the algorithm. Moreover, a selection procedure based on angles is used to maintain the diversity. The performance of the proposed algorithm is verified and compared with several state-of-the-art many-objective evolutionary algorithms on a variety of well-known benchmark problems ranging from 5 to 20 objectives. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms other peer algorithms in terms of both the diversity and the convergence of the final solutions set on most of the test instances. In particular, our proposed algorithm shows obvious superiority when handling the problems with larger number of objectives. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available