4.6 Review

Patterns, Receptors, and Signals: Regulation of Phagosome Maturation

Journal

TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 407-422

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.006

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO)
  2. Belgian Foundation Against Cancer
  3. Interuniversity Attraction Poles
  4. Ghent University Concerted Research Actions (GOA)
  5. European Commission [TOLLerant H2020-MSC-ETN-642157]
  6. Medical Research Council UK [MC_UU_12016/5]
  7. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Merck KGaA
  10. FWO [11W8415N, 11W8417N, 1526615N]
  11. omics@VIB program - Marie Curie FP7 People Cofund
  12. Agence Nationale de Recherche [ANR-16-CE35-0009]
  13. MRC [MC_UP_A500_1020, MC_UU_12016/5] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12016/5, MC_UP_A500_1020] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE35-0009] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recognition of microbial pathogens and dead cells and their phagocytic uptake by specialized immune cells are essential to maintain host homeostasis. Phagosomes undergo fusion and fission events with endosomal and lysosomal compartments, a process called 'phagosome maturation', which leads to the degradation of the phagosomal content. However, many phagocytic cells also act as antigen-presenting cells and must balance degradation and peptide preservation. Emerging evidence indicates that receptor engagement by phagosomal cargo, as well as inflammatory mediators and cellular activation affect many aspects of phagosome maturation. Unsurprisingly, pathogens have developed strategies to hijack this machinery, thereby interfering with host immunity. Here, we highlight progress in this field, summarize findings on the impact of immune signals, and discuss consequences for pathogen elimination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available