4.7 Review

Bacteria encountered in raw insect, spider, scorpion, and centipede taxa including edible species, and their significance from the food hygiene point of view

Journal

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 80-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.007

Keywords

Entomophagy; Food-borne disease; Zoonosis; Public health; Insect farming; Tradition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Insects, spiders, scorpions, and centipedes (non-crustacean arthropods; NCA) are consumed in most areas of the world. However, Western cultures generally do not practice this food habit (entomophagy) despite its advantages for the present and future of human nutrition. Little is known of the microbiological hazards associated with NCA consumption. Scope and approach: The present review summarizes the bacteriological findings on raw arthropod taxa containing edible species. In a second step, it shows potential of bacteria to impair food hygiene and food safety for the human consumer by relating the bacteria found to human diseases. Key findings and conclusions: Many bacterial species are known to affect invertebrates and humans alike (e.g. Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Rickettsiella spp.). Furthermore, insects can act as carriers for human pathogens if not obtained from a hygienic environment (e.g. salmonellae, Campylobacter spp., Shigella spp.). As with other foodstuffs of animal origin, exclusion of clinically diseased specimens, hygienic obtention, washing and thorough heating seem suitable procedures to reduce the risk of food-borne diseases by bacteria, following the tradition of most NCA-consuming communities. Raw consumption of insects should be evaluated thoroughly, even when being traditional, because environmental changes could affect a previously valid innocuousness. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available