4.7 Review

Review: Amylopectin synthesis and hydrolysis - Understanding isoamylase and limit dextrinase and their impact on starch structure on barley (Hordeum vulgare) quality

Journal

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 23-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.11.013

Keywords

Barley; Amylopectin; Starch structure; Isoamylase; Limit dextrinase; Malting quality; Brewing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Starch contributes to barley grain and malt quality which in turn contributes to beer quality and flavour; through fermentable sugar profiles, rates of fermentation and Mallard reactions. Both amylopectin and amylose are enzymatically degraded to release maltose, maltotriose and higher order sugars. Scope and approach: Amylopectin is highly branched [alpha-(1 -> 6) glycoside bond branch points] with numerous short branches while amylose is a long chained polymer with a few side branches. During grain development, the final level of branching is controlled by two enzymes namely; isoamylase and limit dextrinase (LD). Mutations in either of these genes can also result in changes to structure, content, and granule formation and size. During the malting free LD will to cleave the alpha-(1 -> 6) bonds but during mashing processes, bound LD is release, resulting in chains of various length available for other starch degrading enzymes to hydrolyse. Findings and conclusions: While there is a good understanding of most of the individual aspects in amylopectin formation, structure and degradation; the story remains incomplete, as most of this understanding has been gained from experiments with only a limited number of barley varieties, limitations in the technology for structural measurement, and since no data is available to link structure to fermentable sugar profiles. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available