4.5 Article

Is first-trimester HbA1c useful in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes?

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 85-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.019

Keywords

Gestational diabetes mellitus; Glycosylated hemoglobin; Oral glucose tolerance test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the usefulness and efficacy of first-trimester HbA1c in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM). Methods: Prospective observational of consecutive pregnant women. All women had a first-trimester HbA1c determination and GDM screening at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy using a two-step approach. A ROC curve was drawn to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c in detecting GDM and a rule-in rule-out diagnostic algorithm was proposed. The cost of the proposed algorithm was calculated. Results: 152 (13.1%) of 1195 women were diagnosed of GDM. The area under the ROC curve for HbA1c to detect GDM was 0.679 (95% CI 0.631-0.727). A rule-out threshold for HbA1c of 4.8% (29 mmol/mol) had 96.7% sensitivity (95% CI 93.9-99.5), 10.1% specificity (95% CI 8.3-12.0) and a negative predictive value of 95.3% (95% CI 91.3-99.3). A rule-in value of 5.6% (38 mmol/mol) had a positive predictive value of 31.6% (95% CI 24.4-38.9), 89.3% specificity (95% CI 87.4-91.2) and 32.9% sensitivity (95% CI 25.4-40.4). The low positive predictive value of the rule-in threshold precludes its use for GDM diagnosis, but could be used to identify women at high risk of GDM in whom the diagnosis can be established using a one-step approach. The overall saving of the proposed algorithm would be 6.5% of the total cost with the standard strategy. Conclusions: A first-trimester HbA1c does not have sufficient sensitivity or specificity to diagnose GDM, although the use of a higher and lower threshold could simplify the diagnostic process by reducing the number of oral glucose tolerance test, associated costs and patient inconvenience. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available