4.1 Article

Rational Design of Enzyme Compositions for the Production of Functional Hydrolysates of Cow Milk Whey Proteins

Journal

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 669-679

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0003683817060138

Keywords

cheese whey; protein hydrolysates; rational design of the enzyme composition; biologically active peptides; antioxidant activity; antihypertensive properties

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-16-00094]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-16-00094] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design of enzyme compositions for the preparation of functional hydrolysates of whey proteins is studied. Analysis of the protein profiles of the whey from hard, semihard, and soft cheeses showed that the whey contains 50-63% beta-lactoglobulin, 19-20% alpha-lactalbumin, and up to 11% kappa-casein. According to the protein profile, the whey from Circassian cheese contains 76% casein (alpha-, beta-, and kappa-casein), 12% beta-lactoglobulin, and 12% alpha-lactalbumin. Based on the in silico analysis, the rational design of a multienzyme composition was carried out for the hydrolysis of whey with a known protein composition taking into account the content of amino acid descriptors of biological activity and bitter taste. For the hydrolysis of whey from hard (Montazio), soft (Mozzarella and Gorgonzola), and semihard (Caciotta) cheeses, the determined optimum ratio of the Protamex and Alcalase enzymes was 3.0: 1.0% (90 min, 50A degrees D). For soft pickled unripened cheese (Circassian), the optimum ratio of the Thermolysin and Alcalase enzymes was 2.0: 1.0% (60A degrees D, 120 min). The use of the bioinformatics approach made it possible to obtain hydrolysates with acceptable organoleptic properties and predetermined antioxidant (400-500 mu M TE/g protein) and antihypertensive (IC50 537-2500 mg protein/L) activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available