4.5 Article

Dynamic carbon emission performance of Chinese airlines: A global Malmquist index analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 99-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.09.009

Keywords

Carbon emissions; Global Malmquist index; Bootstrap; Chinese airlines; Influencing factors

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203151, 71573186]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NE2017005]
  3. Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province [JY-032]
  4. Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring the carbon emission performance of Chinese airlines helps inform targeted carbon-reduction policies. This paper proposes a global Malmquist carbon emission performance index (GMCPI), which can measure dynamic changes in total factor carbon emissions performance over time using a production frontier framework. The study then applied the proposed index to evaluate carbon emission performance of 12 Chinese airlines from 2007 to 2013; the study also proposed bootstrapping GMCPI to perform statistical inferences on the GMCPI results. The empirical study generated in three meaningful findings. First, the carbon emission performance of the airlines improved by 11.93%, mainly through technological progress. Second, there were carbon emission performance differences among three different airline types; there was also a convergence of carbon emission performance. Third, the most important factor influencing carbon emission performance was the air routes distribution. Chinese airlines should consider improving carbon emission performance further, by establishing an evaluation system, enhancing communication and coordination among different airlines, adjusting the scale of airline development, and optimizing the air routes distribution. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available