4.7 Article

A two-dimensional simulation model for modelling turning vehicles at mixed-flow intersections

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.005

Keywords

Mixed-flow intersections; Turning vehicle; Traffic simulation; Driver behavior; Trajectory

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51422812]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Project of International Cooperation [16510711400]
  3. scientific foundation of Shenzhen government of China [GCZX20140508161906699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The turning behavior is one of the most challenging driving maneuvers under non protected phase at mixed-flow intersections. Currently, one-dimensional simulation models focus on car-following and gap-acceptance behaviors in pre-defined lanes with few lane-changing behaviors, and they cannot model the lateral and longitudinal behaviors simultaneously, which has limitation in representing the realistic turning behavior. This paper proposes a three-layered plan-decision-action (FDA) framework to obtain acceleration and angular velocity in the turning process. The plan layer firstly calculates the twodimensional optimal path and dynamically adjusts the trajectories according to interacting objects. The decision layer then uses the decision tree method to select a suitable behavior in three alternatives: car-following, turning and yielding. Finally, in the action layer, a set of corresponding operational models specify the decided behavior into control parameters. The proposed model is tested by reproducing 210 trajectories of left-turn vehicles at a two-phase mixed-flow intersection in Shanghai. As a result, the simulation reproduces the variation of trajectories, while the coverage rate of the trajectories is 88.8%. Meanwhile, both the travel time and post-encroachment time of simulation and empirical turning vehicles are similar and do not show statistically significant difference. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available