4.7 Article

The Width Distribution of Loops and Strands in the Solar Corona-Are We Hitting Rock Bottom?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 840, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6b01

Keywords

Sun: corona; Sun: UV emission

Funding

  1. NASA [NNG04EA00C, NNG09FA40C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we analyze Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) and Hi-C. images in order to investigate absolute limits for the finest loop strands. We develop a model of the occurrence-size distribution function of coronal loop widths, characterized by the lower limit of widths w(min), the peak (or most frequent) width w(p), the peak occurrence number n(p), and a power-law slope a. Our data analysis includes automated tracing of curvilinear features with the OCCULT-2 code, automated sampling of the cross-sectional widths of coronal loops, and fitting of the theoretical size distribution to the observed distribution. With Monte Carlo simulations and variable pixel sizes Delta x, we derive a first diagnostic criterion to discriminate whether the loop widths are unresolved (w(p)/Dx approximate to 2.5 +/- 0.2) or fully resolved (if w(p)/Delta x greater than or similar to 2.7). For images with resolved loop widths, we can apply a second diagnostic criterion that predicts the lower limit of loop widths as a function of the spatial resolution. We find that the loop widths are marginally resolved in AIA images but are fully resolved in Hi-C images, where our model predicts a most frequent (peak) value at w(p) approximate to 550 km, in agreement with recent results of Brooks et al. This result agrees with the statistics of photospheric granulation sizes and thus supports coronal heating mechanisms operating on the macroscopic scale of photospheric magneto-convection, rather than nanoflare braiding models on unresolved microscopic scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available