4.6 Article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages 1977-1986

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.065

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Many patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis also have significant mitral regurgitation (MR). We sought to understand the association of concomitant MR with TAVR clinical outcomes, as well changes in MR after TAVR. Methods. Patients who underwent TAVR in the US Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry from January 3, 2012, to December 31, 2013, were studied, with longerterm clinical outcomes from Center for Medicare Services data. Results. Of 11,104 patients, 3,481 (31.3%) had moderate MR, and 605 (5.5%) had severe MR. At 1 year, mortality was 21.0%, 21.5%, 26.3%, and 28.0% (p < 0.0001) and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization was 13.9%, 15.8%, 20.3%, and 23.4% (p < 0.0001) in the no, mild, moderate, and severe MR patients, respectively. After adjustment for baseline differences, significant MR was associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality or HF rehospitalization, with a HR of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.35) for moderate MR and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.50) for severe MR, compared with no MR. MR improved early after TAVR grade >= 1 in 79% of the severe MR patients and 66% of the moderate MR patients. Patients whose baseline moderate or severe MR improved had lower mortality (p = 0.022) and HF rehospitalization (p < 0.001) compared with patients whose MR did not improve. Conclusions. Moderate or severe MR accompanying severe AS treated with TAVR is associated with increased mortality or HF rehospitalization. This increased risk may be attributable to the minority of patients whose MR does not improve, suggesting a potential role for surveillance and targeted intervention for those patients. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available