4.4 Article

Evaluation of an active rehabilitation program for concussion management in children and adolescents

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 31, Issue 13-14, Pages 1753-1759

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1346294

Keywords

Brain concussion; mild traumatic brain injury; exercise therapy

Funding

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate the extent to which post-concussion symptoms were influenced by participation In an Active Rehabilitation (AR) program (aerobic exercise, coordination drills, visualization and education) for children and adolescents who are slow to recover from concussion. A secondary exploratory objective included examining the influence of sex on symptom evolution.& para;& para;Methods: Analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on 277 youth who Initiated an AR program, between three and four weeks post-injury at a Concussion Clinic in a tertiary care paediatric teaching hospital.& para;& para;Main outcome measure. Post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) from Sport Concussion Assessment Tool- 3 (SCAT 3).& para;& para;Results: Children and adolescents participating in an active rehabilitation program displayed Improved post- concussion symptom severity at follow-up (median = 9.5) compared to pre-intervention (median = 18) (p < .05). Patients demonstrated Improved physical, cognitive, emotional and sleep-related post-concussion symptoms (p < .05). Female sex was associated with an increased post-concussion symptom severity at follow-up.& para;& para;Conclusions: Youth experiencing persisting symptoms three to four weeks post-concussion demonstrated Improved post-concussion symptoms scores (physical, cognitive, emotional and sleep related) with participation in an active rehabilitation program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available