4.7 Review

Nanomaterials for use in immunosensing of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA): Recent advances

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 185-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.11.003

Keywords

Cancer; Immunoassay; Immunosensor; Tumor biomarkers; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Nanomaterial

Funding

  1. Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  2. Nano Technology Center, Urmia University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review (with 86 refs.) covers the state of the art in electrochemical and optical immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The purpose of the review is to provide useful insights in terms of (a) choice of materials, (b) methods/techniques preferably applied, (c) immunological procedures, (d) immobilization procedures, and (d) other practical aspects. Following an introduction into the field, we give a short account on the principle and general types of immunoassay, and then treat immunoassay for CEA. The first section covers nanomaterial based electrochemical immunoassay, with subsections on using of nanoparticles, hyperbranched polymers, graphene and their derivatives for detection of CEA. A further large section covers photoelectrochemical immunoassay, with assays based on the use of various kinds of nanoparticles, also in combination with carbonaceous nanomaterials, or using upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), graphene quantum dots, and other nanomaterials of interest. The next large section covers optical immunoassay, with examples on assays based on the use of various kinds of conventional nanoparticles (quantum dots), upconversion nanoparticles, graphenes and their derivatives. The review also covers aspects of surface modifications, the effect of nanostructure properties on sensing performance, and the applications of these nanomaterials in conjunction with different kind of signal transducers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available