4.4 Article

In vitro effects of the Fusarium mycotoxins fumonisin B1 and beauvericin on bovine granulosa cell proliferation and steroid production

Journal

TOXICON
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 38-45

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.01.019

Keywords

Beauvericin Cattle; Fumonisin B-1; Granulosa cell; Steroidogenesis; Toxicity

Funding

  1. Endowment of Howard M. & Adene R. Harrington Chair in Animal Science [21-58500]
  2. Oklahoma State University Agricultural (Agric.) Experiment (Exp.) Station (Sta.) [OKL02970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusarium mycotoxins are natural contaminants of various commodities representing significant problem worldwide. Since the co-occurrence of beauvericin (BEA) and fumonisin B-1 (FB1) in grains is frequent, the present study was carried out to evaluate the individual and combined effects of FB1 and BEA on cell proliferation, steroid production and gene expression using bovine granulosa cells (GC). When tested alone FB1 did not show (rho >= 0.05) effects on cell proliferation at any dose. Whereas BEA at 3, 6, and 10 mu M significantly decreased (rho < 0.05) cell numbers. FB1 alone had no significant effect (rho >= 0.05) on progesterone production at any tested doses, whereas FB1 at 1, 1.5 and 3 mu M slightly inhibited (rho < 0.05) estradiol production. At concentrations >= 3 mu M, BEA was found to strongly decrease (rho < 0.05) steroid production, and FB1 did not influence these effects of BEA. At 10 mu M, both mycotoxins decreased (rho < 0.001) serum-induced GC proliferation. At 30 mu M, BEA showed inhibitory effects on FSH plus IGF1induced CYP11A1 and CYP19A1 mRNA abundance (rho < 0.05), whereas FB1 at 30 mu M had no effect on CYP11A1 and CYP19A1 gene expression. Taken together these results demonstrate that the Fusarium mycotoxins BEA and FB1 may impair reproductive function in cattle. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available