4.5 Article

Biocorona formation on gold nanoparticles modulates human proximal tubule kidney cell uptake, cytotoxicity and gene expression

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 150-160

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.04.020

Keywords

Gold nanoparticles; Human proximal tubule cells; Protein corona; Cellular uptake; Gene expression; Mechanisms of toxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. Nanotechnology Innovation Center of Kansas State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) adsorb macromolecules to form a protein corona (PC) after systemic delivery, to which the kidney as the primary excretory organ is constantly exposed. The role of the PC on AuNP cell uptake and toxicity was investigated in vitro in human proximal tubule cells (HPTC) using 40 and 80 nm branched polyethylenimine (BPEI), lipoic acid (LA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)coated AuNP with or without (bare) PCs composed of human plasma (HP) or human serum albumin (HSA) for 0.25 to 24 h. Time-dependent intracellular uptake, assessed by ICP-MS showed PC modulated cell uptake and cytotoxicity; with bare 40 nm BPEI-AuNP showing the greatest responses. All AuNP showed minimal to no cytokine release. At the nontoxic dose, 40 nm bare BPEI-AuNP significantly modified gene expression related to immunotoxicity, steatosis, and mitochondrial metabolism; while at the high dose, pathways of DNA damage and repair, apoptosis, fatty acid metabolism and heat shock response were modulated. HP corona BPEI-AuNP response was comparable to control. These studies clearly showed reduced uptake and cytotoxicity, as well as differentiated gene expression of AuNP with PCs, questioning the utility of in vitro studies using bare NP to assess in vivo effects. Significantly, only cationic bare BPEI-AuNP had HPTC uptake or cytotoxicity suggesting the relative safety of PEG and LA-AuNP as nanomedicine constructs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available