4.5 Article

Effect of acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in a primary astrocytes/microglial co-culture model

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages 119-125

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.11.007

Keywords

Acrylamide; Neurotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Co-cultural cells; Microglia; Astrocytes

Categories

Funding

  1. China Government Scholarship from the China Scholarship Council
  2. Canada Research Chair Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acrylamide (AA), is a common food contaminant generated by heat processing. Astrocytes and microglia are the two major glial cell types in the brain that play pivotal but different roles in maintaining optimal brain function. The objective of this study is to investigate the neurotoxicity of AA, using a primary astrocytes/microglia co-culture model. Co-cultural cells obtained from Balb/c mice were cultured and treated with 0-1.0 mM AA for 24-96 h. Cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, oxidative end produces formation and glutathione (GSH) levels were measured. The expression of nuclear-E2-related factor 2(Nrf2), and nuclear factor kappa-beta (NF-kappa B) and selected down-stream genes were measured. Results showed that AA treatment led toa dose-dependent toxicity. Oxidative stress was induced as indicated by an increase of ROS, a decrease of GSH levels, and an increase in the formation of 4-hydroxynonenal-adduct and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine-adduct Both Nrf2 and NF-kappa B pathway contributed to the initiation of oxidative stress but the timing of two factors was different. Nrf2 and its related downstream genes were activated earlier than that in NF-kappa 3 pathway. In conclusion, AA-induced neurotoxicity attribute to oxidative stress via Nrf2 and NF-kappa B pathway. Moreover, the co-culture cell model was proven to be a viable model to study AA neurotoxicity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available