4.3 Article

Cytological staining of protozoa: a case study on the impregnation of hypotrichs (Ciliophora: spirotrichea) using laboratory-synthesized protargol

Journal

ANIMAL CELLS AND SYSTEMS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 412-418

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2017.1376707

Keywords

Infraciliature; species identification; silver proteinate; silver staining

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2017R1C1B5017183]
  3. Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (KIOST) [PE99513]
  4. Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI) [PE17900]
  5. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [PE99513] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protargol (silver proteinate) impregnation is a common method used to identify and characterize ciliated protozoa. Unfortunately, chemical companies have stopped producing the ' strong'protargol powder used in this method. Based on an in-house protocol for its synthesis published in 2013, more than 10 batches of protargol powder were produced and subsequently applied in taxonomic studies. During these studies, the protocol for protargol powder synthesis was slightly modified and employed a peptone not originally listed in the 2013 protocol. This modification improved the results of the impregnation protocol. Protargol preparations of hypotrichs were optimized by adjusting the pH during staining rather than during the synthesis. The pH was adjusted to 7.5-7.6, and an acetone developer was used. While the conditions used in this study are not completely comparable to those using the commercially produced protargol, access to this information could help researchers investigate the diversity of ciliates, particularly hypotrichs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available