4.6 Article

Loss of Nrf2 promotes rapid progression to heart failure following myocardial infarction

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 327, Issue -, Pages 52-58

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.03.025

Keywords

Transcription factor; Tissue repair; Remodeling; Cardiovascular; Biomarkers

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [T32 ES007091, R01 HL089958, R21ES017473, R01 GM111337]
  2. University of Arizona Dean's Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nrf2 gene encodes a transcription factor regulating the expression of antioxidant and detoxification genes. We test here whether Nrf2 plays a role for cardiac protection during ischemic injury in an effort to establish Nrf2 as a target for cardiac protection therapies. Cardiac ischemia induced by the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation results in myocardial infarction (MI). Young mice surviving MI show minimal signs of heart failure. Mice lacking Nrf2 experience an accelerated progression to heart failure that occurs within 10 days following induction of MI. Nrf2 knockout (Nrf2 KO) mice have a survival rate similar to wild type (WT) mice at 24 h after MI, but a significantly higher mortality rate within 10 days after MI (50% vs 86%). Morphological examination revealed maladaptive remodeling, including cardiac hypertrophy and dilated left ventricle in Nrf2 KO mice, which were absent in WT mice. Measurements of cardiac function revealed increased left ventricular mass and decreases in cardiac output in Nrf2 KO mice. In addition, Nrf2 KO mice show biomarkers of heart failure, such as elevated levels of beta-MHC, ANF, and BNP mRNA in the myocardium. These data support that Nrf2 plays an important role in protecting the myocardium from ischemic injury. Lack of Nrf2 leads to rapid development of heart failure. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available