4.7 Article

Prevention of oxytosis-induced c-Raf down-regulation by (arylthio) cyclopentenone prostaglandins is neuroprotective

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 390, Issue -, Pages 83-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.09.006

Keywords

Cyclopentenone prostaglandins; HT22 cells; Oxidative stress; c-Raf

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prolonged exposure to high concentrations of glutamate leads to cell type specific glutathione depletion and resulting oxidative stress, known as oxytosis. As a result of glutathione depletion, accumulation of reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ influx are increased; however, the specific target of oxytosis has yet to be identified. In the present study, we focused on the effect of glutamate-induced oxidative stress on the extracellular-regulated protein kinase (ERR) pathway using the murine hippocampal HT22 cell line. Although the contribution of the ERIC pathway to glutamate-induced oxytosis in HT22 cells is controversial, Western blot analysis revealed that glutamate caused down-regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (c-Raf) and a resulting decrease in the phosphorylation of c-Raf, as well as of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinasel/2 (MEK1/2) and ERR1/2, downstream components of the c-Raf/MER/ERK pathway. Furthermore, neuroprotective (arylthio) cyclopentenone prostaglandins prevented glutamate-induced c-Raf down-regulation and consequently maintained the basal activity of c-Raf and its downstream signaling components. A pull-down assay using biotin labeled cyclopentenone prostaglandins revealed that they preferentially bound to c-Raf relative to other signaling molecules of the ERK pathway, including Ras, MEK1/2, and ERK. These results suggest that neuroprotective (arylthio)cyclopentenone prostaglandins directly bind to c-Raf protein and protect cells from down regulation of the c-Raf protein itself, resulting in neuroprotection against oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available