4.0 Article

REMARKS ON MOTIVES OF ABELIAN TYPE

Journal

TOHOKU MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 195-220

Publisher

TOHOKU UNIVERSITY
DOI: 10.2748/tmj/1498269623

Keywords

Algebraic cycles; Chow groups; motives; abelian varieties; finite-dimensionality

Categories

Funding

  1. EPSRC Early Career Fellowship [EP/K005545/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K005545/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A motive. over a field k is of abelian type if it belongs to the thick and rigid subcategory of Chow motives spanned by the motives of abelian varieties over k. This paper contains three sections of independent interest. First, we show that a motive which becomes of abelian type after a base field extension of algebraically closed fields is of abelian type. Given a field extension K/k and a motive M over k, we also show that M is finite dimensional if and only if M-K is finite-dimensional. As a corollary, we obtain Chow-Kunneth decompositions for varieties that become isomorphic to an abelian variety after some field extension. Second, let Omega be a universal domain containing k. We show that Murre's conjectures for motives of abelian type over k reduce to Murre's conjecture (D) for products of curves over Omega. In particular, we show that Murre's conjecture (D) for products of curves over Omega implies Beauville's vanishing conjecture on abelian varieties over k. Finally, we give criteria on Chow groups for a motive to be of abelian type. For instance, we show that M is of abelian type if and only if the total Chow group of algebraically trivial cycles CH*(M Omega)(alg) is spanned, via the action of correspondences, by the Chow groups of products of curves. We also show that a morphism of motives f : N -> M, with N finite-dimensional, which induces a surjection f* : CH*(N Omega)(alg) -> CH*(M Omega)(alg) also induces a surjection f* : CH*(N Omega)(hom) -> CH*(M Omega)(hom) on homologically trivial cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available