4.5 Article

Quantifying the Relationship between Single-Molecule Probes and Subunit Rotation in the Ribosome

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages 2777-2786

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.021

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award [MCB-1350312]
  2. Northeastern University Discovery Cluster
  3. National Science Foundation [HRD:1102489]
  4. C3DDB Cluster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major challenge in the study of biomolecular assemblies is to identify reaction coordinates that precisely monitor conformational rearrangements. This is central to the interpretation of single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements, where the observed dynamics depends on the labeling strategy. As an example, different probes of subunit rotation in the ribosome have provided qualitatively distinct descriptions. In one study, changes in fluorescence suggested that the 30S body undergoes a single rotation/back-rotation cycle during the process of mRNA-tRNA translocation. In contrast, an alternate assay implicated the presence of reversible rotation events before completing translocation. For future single-molecule experiments to unambiguously measure the relationship between subunit rotation and translocation, it is necessary to rationalize these conflicting descriptions. To this end, we have simulated hundreds of spontaneous subunit rotation events (approximate to 8 degrees) using a residue-level coarse-grained model of the ribosome. We analyzed nine different reaction coordinates and found that the apparently inconsistent measurements are likely a consequence of ribosomal flexibility. Further, we propose a metric for quantifying the degree of energetic coupling between experimentally measured degrees of freedom and subunit rotation. This analysis provides a physically grounded framework that can guide the development of more precise single-molecule techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available