4.6 Article

Low nutrient and high chlorophyll a coastal upwelling system - A case study in the southern Taiwan Strait

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 170-177

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.05.020

Keywords

chlorophyll a; coastal upwelling; nutrients; phytoplankton; southern Taiwan Strait

Funding

  1. China NSF [41330961, U1406403, 41249904, 41466001]
  2. National Basic Key Research Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015CB954002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the field data during four summer cruises of 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2013, an interesting phenomenon of low nutrient and high Chl.a (LNHC) was observed in the coastal upwelling system off Dongshan in the southern Taiwan Strait. The results indicated that the upwelling region was dominated by cold (<25 degrees C) and saline (>33.9 psu) upwelled water, and the concentration of nitrate (<1 mu M) and phosphate (<0.1 mu M) was very low, while with high Chl.a content (mean 1.98-3.56 mu g L-1, maximum 8.3 mu g L-1) during the stronger summer upwelling cruise of 2005, 2006 and 2008. The upwelled water originated from the 50-100 m layer off Shanwei with a low concentration of nitrate (<7.5 mu mol.L-1) and phosphate (<0.5 mu mol.L-1), which was transported to Shantou-Dongshan by the northeastward bottom current. During the time that the upwelled water moved the long-distance (150-300 km) from Shanwei to Shantou-Dongshan and was transported through the euphotic zone alongshore, the phytoplankton grew rapidly due to the favorable temperature, N/P ratio and illumination, and consumed most of the nutrients in the upwelled water. These unique physical, chemical and biological processes are the main reasons for the formation of the low nutrients/high chlorophyll a in this coastal upwelling system in the southern Taiwan Strait. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available