4.7 Article

Statistical Studies of Solar White-light Flares and Comparisons with Superflares on Solar-type Stars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 851, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b34

Keywords

magnetic reconnection; stars: flare; Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP26800096, JP26400231, JP15K17772, JP15K17622, JP16H03955, JP16H01187, JP16J00320, JP16J06887, JP17H02865, JP17K05400]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01187, 16J06887, 16H03955, 15H05814, 17K05400, 16J00320, 15K17772, 15K17622, 26400231] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, many superflares on solar-type stars have been discovered as white-light flares (WLFs). The statistical study found a correlation between their energies (E) and durations (tau): tau proportional to E-0.39, similar to those of solar hard/soft X-ray flares, tau proportional to E0.2-0.33. This indicates a universal mechanism of energy release on solar and stellar flares, i.e., magnetic reconnection. We here carried out statistical research on 50 solar WLFs observed with Solar Dynamics Observatory/HMI and examined the correlation between the energies and durations. As a result, the E-tau relation on solar WLFs (tau proportional to E-0.38) is quite similar to that on stellar superflares (tau proportional to E-0.39). However, the durations of stellar superflares are one order of magnitude shorter than those expected from solar WLFs. We present the following two interpretations for the discrepancy: (1) in solar flares, the cooling timescale of WLFs may be longer than the reconnection one, and the decay time of solar WLFs can be elongated by the cooling effect; (2) the distribution can be understood by applying a scaling law (tau proportional to (EB-5/3)-B-1/3) derived from the magnetic reconnection theory. In the latter case, the observed superflares are expected to have 2-4 times stronger magnetic field strength than solar flares.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available