4.7 Article

Long-term Photometric Variability in Kepler Full-frame Images: Magnetic Cycles of Sun-like Stars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 851, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9e00

Keywords

methods: data analysis; stars: activity; stars: solar-type; techniques: photometric

Funding

  1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
  2. Banneker Institute at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  3. NASA Science Mission directorate
  4. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  5. NASA Office of Space Science [NNX13AC07G]
  6. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photometry from the Kepler mission is optimized to detect small, short-duration signals like planet transits at the expense of long-term trends. This long-term variability can be recovered in photometry from the full-frame images (FFIs), a set of calibration data collected approximately monthly during the Kepler mission. Here we present f3, an open-source package to perform photometry on the Kepler FFIs in order to detect changes in the brightness of stars in the Kepler field of view over long time baselines. We apply this package to a sample of 4000 Sun-like stars with measured rotation periods. We find that approximate to 10% of these targets have long-term variability in their observed flux. For the majority of targets, we find that the luminosity variations are either correlated or anticorrelated with the short-term variability due to starspots on the stellar surface. We find a transition between anticorrelated (starspot-dominated) variability and correlated (facula-dominated) variability between rotation periods of 15 and 25 days, suggesting the transition between the two modes is complete for stars at the age of the Sun. We also identify a sample of stars with apparently complete cycles, as well as a collection of short-period binaries with extreme photometric variation over the Kepler mission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available