4.5 Article

Small-Scale Nekton Density and Growth Patterns Across a Saltmarsh Landscape in Barataria Bay, Louisiana

Journal

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 2000-2018

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-015-9945-3

Keywords

Marsh edge; Fishery habitat; Spartina marsh; Growth experiment

Funding

  1. Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force
  2. NOAA Restoration Center
  3. NOAA Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nekton on the northern Gulf of Mexico depend on estuarine nursery areas, but patterns of habitat use and the underlying processes that drive these patterns are not fully understood. We examined small-scale (1-50 m) patterns of habitat use in Barataria Bay by collecting nekton samples between 2002 and 2006 with a 1-m(2) drop sampler. Habitat-specific densities were estimated for six habitat types at various distances from the shoreline in marsh (Marsh1M = 1 m and Marsh3M = 3 m) and over shallow nonvegetated bottom, SNB (SNB1M = 1 m, SNB5M = 5 m, SNB20M = 20 m, and SNB50M = 50 m). Habitat-specific growth rates also were estimated for brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus caged in SNB1M, SNB5M, and SNB20M. Nekton density patterns in Barataria Bay appeared to be clearly different from the Galveston Bay model, which predicts nekton distribution patterns relative to the marsh shoreline. Although densities in Barataria Bay were significantly higher in samples near the marsh shoreline (Marsh1M or SNB1M) for brown shrimp, blue crab, and white shrimp, highest mean densities were not always present in marsh edge vegetation. In addition, densities of brown shrimp and white shrimp in Barataria Bay declined much more steeply with distance into the marsh than in the model. Daily growth rates (1.0-1.2 mm TL day(-1), 68-89 mg day(-1)) for brown shrimp were similar among SNB habitat types. Our results suggest that SNB in Barataria Bay may be relatively more important as habitat for fishery species than previously assumed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available