4.7 Article

Study on the impacts of human walking on indoor particles dispersion using momentum theory method

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 195-206

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.001

Keywords

CFD; Human walking; Air flow; Particle dispersion; Momentum theory method; Dynamic mesh

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51508362, 51778385]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150328]
  3. Joint Usage/Research Center Program of MEXT (Japanese Government) [D172005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particle dispersion can be influenced by human activities' inducing effect, which may not be allowed in high demanded cleanness environment, such as operation room. The application of dynamic mesh simulation method has been widely applied for objects moving, which is not CPU-friendly in calculation as well as complex meshing required. Thus, we proposed a new method of momentum theory to investigate human motion induced effects on indoor environments (i.e., momentum source implemented into Navier-Stokes equations to simulate human/objects moving). Experiments were conducted for validation. RNG k-s model was adopted for turbulence modeling. Both methods of dynamic mesh and momentum theory were used to investigate the impacts of human induced motion on indoor environments of airflow distributions and particles dispersion. It was found that momentum theory method is sufficiently fine when compared to dynamic mesh (flow and particle deviation within 15% and 5% respectively). Momentum theory method was then employed to investigate the decay process of particle concentration influenced by human walking in a chamber, which could save 90% of the calculation time compared to dynamic mesh method. The results also indicated that particles decay would be delayed in the presence of object moving. Particle concentration in different zones of the chamber was also discussed. We found that particle decay effected by human motion (with speed of 0.2 m/s) was 19.6% faster than that without human motion in the region with larger background airflow velocities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available