4.7 Review

Energy, economics, and performativity: Reviewing theoretical advances in social studies of markets and energy

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 4-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.005

Keywords

Social studies of markets; Performativity; Economics; Energy and electricity; Infrastructure; Liberalisation

Funding

  1. European Commission Horizon
  2. Scottish ClimateXChange
  3. Princeton University, Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Global Systemic Risk Research Community

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For many years, energy market design has held great promises as a solution to current energy issues; ranging from increasing international trade to emissions reduction, the securing of future electricity capacity, and increasing flexibility amid growing intermittent renewable energy resources. The emerging economic understandings of the energy infrastructure motivate conceptual and methodological innovations in the social sciences, which this paper pursues. Its first part describes recent advances in social studies of markets, which seek greater appreciation of the role of economics in the formation of markets via economic theories, instruments, and many other means. The second part focuses on emerging studies which draw on these approaches to examine energy systems including their markets, liberalisation, and sustainability. The essay brings together social studies of markets with energy and opens up important topics for understanding current energy transitions. These include how financial systems can be treated as key components of the socio-technical energy system in transition; and conversely, how the case of energy adds to the theories of social studies of markets and economics by highlighting manifold interdependencies between economics, engineering problems, existing infrastructures, and political contentions when market-based energy is at stake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available