4.5 Review

A review of Additive Manufacturing technology and Cost Estimation techniques for the defence sector

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.07.001

Keywords

Technology acquisition; Cost Estimation; Activity Based Costing; Additive Manufacturing; Defence Support Services

Funding

  1. EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Through-Life Engineering Services [EP/1033246/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/I033246/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I033246/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a promising technology which will provide major advantages to Defence Support Service providers, given its ability of delocalised manufacturing near the point of use. The technology is gaining increasing interest due to its disruptive potential. AM groups together a wide range of different approaches which have the ability to convert a 3D file into a physical product by depositing layer upon layer of material. AM is still under development and considered an immature technology. This immaturity provides high level of uncertainty around key indicators such as time and cost. These indicators represent also key decision variables to evaluate AM and compare it with traditional manufacturing. This review paper represents an investigation of existing knowledge on AM and aims to present to the reader the various AM approaches with a detailed focus on the most applicable technologies to Defence Support Services. The paper is structured as follows, firstly the various technologies of AM and their economic aspects are presented, secondly the cost modelling techniques are investigated and finally a discussion is carried out. The contribution of this paper is to present to Defence Support Service stakeholders the various AM technologies and cost modelling techniques for measuring the product or service cost. (C) 2017 CIRP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available