4.0 Article

Inflammation and Cognition in Older Adults: Evidence from Taiwan

Journal

BIODEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL BIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 309-323

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2017.1403305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD047879]
  2. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [R01AG016790]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammation has been linked to clinical cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease. Less is known, however, about the relationship between inflammation and normal, age-associated cognitive decline. An understanding of the determinants of all types of cognitive decline is important for improving quality of life in an aging world. This study investigated whether biomarkers of inflammation were associated with cognitive function and decline in older Taiwanese adults. Data were from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study of Aging and the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study. Inflammation was measured in 2000 and 2006 as C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, soluble e-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and white blood cell count. Cognition was assessed by 10 cognitive and memory tasks, measured in 2006, 2007, and 2011. Growth curve models were used to examine the relationship between inflammation and cognitive score over this time period. Higher levels of inflammation were associated with lower baseline cognitive scores, but not with longitudinal change in cognitive score. This study did not support a causal link between inflammation and cognitive decline among this older cohort. The observed cross-sectional relationship could reflect a causal relationship that arises earlier in life, or confounding; additional research across the life course is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available