4.4 Article

Real-time core body temperature estimation from heart rate for first responders wearing different levels of personal protective equipment

Journal

ERGONOMICS
Volume 58, Issue 11, Pages 1830-1841

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1036792

Keywords

non-invasive; thermal-work strain; heat strain; fire-fighter monitoring; core temperature prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First responders often wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for protection from on-the-job hazards. While PPE ensembles offer individuals protection, they limit one's ability to thermoregulate, and can place the wearer in danger of heat exhaustion and higher cardiac stress. Automatically monitoring thermal-work strain is one means to manage these risks, but measuring core body temperature (T-c) has proved problematic. An algorithm that estimates T-c from sequential measures of heart rate (HR) was compared to the observed T-c from 27 US soldiers participating in three different chemical/biological training events (45-90min duration) while wearing PPE. Hotter participants (higher T-c) averaged (HRs) of 140bpm and reached T-c around 39 degrees C. Overall the algorithm had a small bias (0.02 degrees C) and root mean square error (0.21 degrees C). Limits of agreement (LoA0.48 degrees C) were similar to comparisons of T-c measured by oesophageal and rectal probes. The algorithm shows promise for use in real-time monitoring of encapsulated first responders. Practitioner Summary: An algorithm to estimate core temperature (T-c) from non-invasive measures of HR was validated. Three independent studies (n=27) compared the estimated T-c to the observed T-c in humans participating in chemical/biological hazard training. The algorithm's bias and variance to observed data were similar to that found from comparisons of oesophageal and rectal measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available