4.6 Article

Synthesis and performance of nanostructured silicon/graphite composites with a thin carbon shell and engineered voids

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages 274-283

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.198

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Anode; Silicon; High-energy ball mill

Funding

  1. Rowe Family Endowment Fund
  2. Tang Fellowship
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1660572]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing silicon as an anode material for Li-ion batteries has been the subject of many studies. However, due to the huge volume change of silicon during lithiation, the electrochemical performance of silicon is poor. Here, we have investigated a novel yet simple approach to synthesize nanostructured silicon/graphite composites with a carbon coating and engineered voids. High-energy ball mill is employed to convert micrometer-sized silicon and graphite to nanostructured silicon/graphite composite building blocks, while a thin carbon coating is applied to encapsulate these composite agglomerates, followed by partial etching of silicon to create engineered voids inside the composite agglomerates. The batteries made with this tailored nanostructure exhibit improved electrochemical performance over the counterparts made with silicon nanoparticles and exhibited a specific capacity of similar to 1800 mA h g(-1) discharge capacity at the first cycle, 580 mA h g(-1) after 40 cycles, and 350 mA h g(-1) after 300 cycles. This study has established a novel method scalable at industry environment and capable of producing low cost Si anodes and clearly shown that the cycle stability of the tailored nanostructure improves with increasing engineered voids in the range we have investigated. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available