4.5 Article

Response of vegetation NDVI to climatic extremes in the arid region of Central Asia: a case study in Xinjiang, China

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 3-4, Pages 1503-1515

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2058-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Research Operating Expenses of the Central level Non-profit Research Institutes [IDM201506]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592915XB]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41605067, 41375101, U1503181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observed data showed the climatic transition from warm-dry to warm-wet in Xinjiang during the past 30 years and will probably affect vegetation dynamics. Here, we analyze the interannual change of vegetation index based on the satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) with temperature and precipitation extreme over the Xinjiang, using the 8-km NDVI third-generation (NDVI3g) from the Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) from 1982 to 2010. Few previous studies analyzed the link between climate extremes and vegetation response. From the satellite-based results, annual NDVI significantly increased in the first two decades (1981-1998) and then decreased after 1998. We show that the NDVI decrease over the past decade may conjointly be triggered by the increases of temperature and precipitation extremes. The correlation analyses demonstrated that the trends of NDVI was close to the trend of extreme precipitation; that is, consecutive dry days (CDD) and torrential rainfall days (R24) positively correlated with NDVI during 1998-2010. For the temperature extreme, while the decreases of NDVI correlate positively with warmer mean minimum temperature (Tnav), it correlates negatively with the number of warmest night days (Rwn). The results suggest that the climatic extremes have possible negative effects on the ecosystem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available