4.6 Article

Genotyping tumour DNA in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of a HER2-positive breast cancer patient with brain metastases

Journal

ESMO OPEN
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000253

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [602901]
  2. H2020 [635342-2]
  3. IMI [115749]
  4. AIRC Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 per mille [9970]
  5. AIRC IG [16788]
  6. Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro-ONLUS 5 per mille Ministero della Salute
  7. Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro-ONLUS 5 per mille
  8. AIRC
  9. NCI [R03CA187094-01]
  10. NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]
  11. Breast Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Central nervous system (CNS) involvement contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and represents a major challenge for clinicians. Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) harbours clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with CNS metastases and could be effective in tracking tumour evolution. Methods In a HER2-positive mBC patient with brain metastases, we applied droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis to measure ctDNA dynamic changes in CSF and plasma collected during treatment. Results Baseline CSF-derived ctDNA analysis revealed TP53 and PIK3CA mutations as well as ERBB2 and cMYC amplification. Post-treatment ctDNA analysis showed decreased markers level in plasma, consistent with extra-CNS disease control, while increased in the CSF, confirming poor treatment benefit in the CNS. Discussion Analysis of ctDNA in the CSF of HER2-positive mBC is feasible and could represent a useful companion for clinical management of brain metastases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available