4.8 Article

Impedimetric Sensor of ss-HSDNA/Reduced Graphene Oxide Aerogel Electrode toward Aflatoxin B1 Detection: Effects of Redox Mediator Charges and Hydrodynamic Diffusion

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 89, Issue 24, Pages 13283-13289

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03329

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology [RSA5880043]
  3. Frontier Research Centre at VISTEC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, an impedimetric biosensor for determination and quantification of an aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) level using a reduced graphene oxide aerogel labeled with a single strand DNA (ss-HSDNA/rGO(ae)) modified on a rotating disk electrode (RDE) is presented. Owing to the large biomolecule biding on the elettrode, aft electron transfer is interrupted and not,easily accessible to a target molecule.. To address this issue, we aim to study two effects; one considers electro-redox mediators and the other considers the hydrodynamic effect. By observing a cyclic voltammetric response from the ss-HSDNA/rGO(ae) electrode in three different charges of the redox mediators (i.e., neutral FcCH(2)OH, cationic Ru(NH3)(6)(3+), and anionic Fe(CN)(6)(4-)) in a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) containing AFB1, the magnitude of anodic current at 50 mV s(-1) is 825, 615, and 550 mA cm(-1), respectively, which is significant dominated by the charge of the redox probe. The effect of hydrodynamic diffusion of the ss-HSDNA/rGO(ae) rotating disk electrode (RDE) toward detection using FcCH(2)OH as the redox mediator was recorded by applying a range of rotating speed from 500 to 4000 rpm. Increasing rotating speed reduces the charge transfer resistance resulting in the lower detectable level for AFB1 quantification. In the case of 4000 rpm, the AFB1 can be detected with a limit of detection of 0.04 ng/mL and a linear range of 1 X 10(-40) to 7 X 10(-8)g/mL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available