4.1 Article

Observational long-term follow-up study of rapid food oral immunotherapy with omalizumab

Journal

ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13223-017-0223-8

Keywords

Follow-up; Food allergy; Maintenance dosing; Omalizumab; Oral immunotherapy

Funding

  1. NIAID [R21AI095838, U19AI104209]
  2. Myra Reinhard family Foundation
  3. Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University
  4. Food Allergy Research and Education Center of Excellence
  5. Trip Advisor Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A number of clinical studies focused on treating a single food allergy through oral immunotherapy (OIT) with adjunctive omalizumab treatment have been published. We previously demonstrated safety and tolerability of a rapid OIT protocol using omalizumab in a phase 1 study to achieve desensitization to multiple (up to 5) food allergens in parallel, rapidly (7-36 weeks; median = 18 weeks). In the current long-term, observational study, we followed 34 food allergic participants for over 5 years, who had originally undergone the phase 1 rapid OIT protocol. Methods: After reaching the maintenance dose of 2 g protein for each of their respective food allergens as a part of the phase 1 study, the long-term maintenance dose was reduced for some participants based on a pragmatic team-based decision. Participants were followed up to 62 months through standard oral food challenges (OFCs), skin prick tests, and blood tests. Results: Each participant passed the 2 g OFC to each of their offending food allergens (up to 5 food allergens in total) at the end of the long-term follow-up (LTFU) study. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of long-term maintenance dosing of a food allergen without compromising the desensitized status conferred through rapid-OIT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available