4.4 Article

Identification of Circulating Long Noncoding RNA HOTAIR as a Novel Biomarker for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1060-1066

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1533034617723754

Keywords

LncRNA; HOTAIR; NSCLC; diagnosis; monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long noncoding RNA (LncRNA) homeotic genes (HOX) transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR) has been reported to play a vital role in various cancers. It has been found that HOTAIR was upregulated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and involved in cell invasion and metastasis. The aberrant expression of HOTAIR is expected to serve as a potential biomarker for patients with NSCLC. Our aim in this study was to detect the plasma levels of HOTAIR and further evaluate its diagnostic value for NSCLC. The levels of HOTAIR were measured in 105 patients with NSCLC and 80 healthy controls by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The results indicated that plasma HOTAIR levels were higher in NSCLC than in healthy controls. Besides, plasma HOTAIR levels were associated with histology subtype (P = .039) and tumor-node-metastasis stage (P = .022). The ROC curves showed that plasma HOTAIR has high diagnostic accuracy for NSCLC, and the area under curve (AUC) for NSCLC versus healthy was 0.791 (95% CI: 0.727-0.855) which was higher than carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (AUC = 0.737, 95% CI: 0.666-0.808). Moreover, the combination of HOTAIR and CEA could provide a more accurate diagnosis than HOTAIR or CEA alone (AUC = 0.841, 95% CI: 0.783-0.898). Plasma HOTAIR levels were significantly lower in postoperative samples than in preoperative samples. Plasma HOTAIR could serve as a promising biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available